• Home Page
  • All Posts
  • About us
Wednesday, May 20, 2026
SocialPolicy English edition
  • Events
  • Employment
    • Jobs
    • Traineeships
  • Lifelong Learning
    • Master’s Studies
    • PhD Opportunities
    • Scholarships
  • Social Policy
    • Articles
    • Social Protection
    • Social Cohesion
    • Gender Equality
    • Employment Policies
    • Social Economy
    • Health Policies
    • Mental Health
    • Social Housing
    • Social Inclusion
    • Social Policy Programs
  • Social Theory
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
  • Events
  • Employment
    • Jobs
    • Traineeships
  • Lifelong Learning
    • Master’s Studies
    • PhD Opportunities
    • Scholarships
  • Social Policy
    • Articles
    • Social Protection
    • Social Cohesion
    • Gender Equality
    • Employment Policies
    • Social Economy
    • Health Policies
    • Mental Health
    • Social Housing
    • Social Inclusion
    • Social Policy Programs
  • Social Theory
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
SocialPolicy English edition
No Result
View All Result
Home Social Policy Gender Equality

Almost 1 in 2 women in the EU have experienced psychological violence

EIGE’s latest report on coercive control and psychological violence across the EU Member States proves high prevalence.

Deleuze “after” Kristeva: Affective Genesis and the Potential for Critique
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

EIGE’s latest report on coercive control and psychological violence across the EU Member States proves high prevalence. However, increased criminalisation measures are starting to be put in place. More needs to be done.

What is coercive control and psychological violence? The following explanations characterise the nature of both forms of abuse.

  • Coercive control is defined as “a strategic course of oppressive conduct typically characterized by frequent, but low-level physical abuse and sexual coercion in combination with tactics to intimidate, degrade, isolate, and control victims” (Stark, 2013: 18).
  • The Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (the Istanbul Convention) (Article 33) defines psychological violence as “any intentional course of conduct that seriously impairs another person’s psychological integrity through coercion or threats.”

As it stands, the statistics are stacked in a grim reality. Data from the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) showed that across the EU, 44 % of women have experienced psychological violence from a partner in their lifetime.

EIGE recommends to specifically, explicitly and comprehensively treat psychological violence as a stand-alone phenomenon. It also pleads to include a digital dimension in the prevention and response framework targeted at victims of online abuse – as well as ensuring practices reach the most at-risk groups and those who have additional needs.

In EIGE’s research, younger women (under 30), women with a disability or health condition, non-heterosexual women and women with a migrant background experience psychological violence at a higher rate than the general population.

The implications of psychological violence and coercive control are deeply profound on women victims, where risk of suicide, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are particularly rife.

Additionally, the negative impact on victims’ children can be profound and could lead to an increased risk of victimisation and perpetration later on in adulthood.

Now, in the age of digital dominance, several Member States are taking the psychological impact of cyber violence into account. In Italy, the use of electronic communication is an aggravating circumstance for stalking and, in France, it is an aggravating circumstance for sexual harassment. In Austria, cyberstalking is specifically mentioned as a form of stalking in the criminal code.

Combatting coercive control and psychological violence comes with myriad challenges, given the barriers for effective prevention. For 28% of practitioners surveyed by EIGE for this project, the lack of knowledge on psychological violence remains the most important obstacle to prevention.  As a result, victims of coercive control and psychological violence are reluctant to report their experiences.

From a legal perspective, in most EU Member States psychological violence is prosecuted under criminal offences that are not specific to the domestic or intimate partner context. Denmark, Spain, France, Hungary and Ireland have implemented specific criminal offences for psychological violence or coercive control. And only Denmark and Ireland use the language of coercive control in legislation.

Read the full report here

Explore EIGE’s resources on gender-based violence

Source: https://eige.europa.eu/news/almost-1-2-women-eu-have-experienced-psychological-violence

Read Also  Greece | Second Annual Report on Violence Against Women
Tags: gender equalitygender-based violencesocial policyviolence against women

Related Posts

2021 Annual Report of the Social Protection Committee now available

Deal to improve the protection of vulnerable adults

by fGxfvU1nE7
May 17, 2026
0

Equal access to justice for adults who require support and safeguards in decision-making.  

Protecting people working through platforms

Commission welcomes important step to modernise EU social security coordination rules

by fGxfvU1nE7
May 16, 2026
0

The revised rules are an important step towards fair labour mobility in the EU. They make it easier for people to work,...

2021 Annual Report of the Social Protection Committee now available

The ‘Right to Injustice’: A Critique of Exclusions in Greek Tertiary Education as bureaucratic trauma

by fGxfvU1nE7
March 24, 2026
0

This commentary will demonstrate how the educational system of Greece systematically penalizes those whose family circumstances demand 'extra' labor

EPIC publishes research note exploring access to healthcare services for homeless children and young people

Full report on European Child Guarantee survey among children now available

by fGxfvU1nE7
March 23, 2026
0

Children from across the EU participated in an online survey sharing their views on the European Child Guarantee.

Load More
Next Post
Quality and effective apprenticeships: Commission takes stock of Member States’ progress

ESSPASS Pilot Project - exploring a new digital tool to help mobile citizens exercise their social security rights across borders

Fundamental Rights Report 2022

Fundamental Rights Report 2022

Transforming social services: Why we need a new model of care

Transforming social services: Why we need a new model of care

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • Deal to improve the protection of vulnerable adults
  • Commission welcomes important step to modernise EU social security coordination rules
  • The ‘Right to Injustice’: A Critique of Exclusions in Greek Tertiary Education as bureaucratic trauma
  • Full report on European Child Guarantee survey among children now available
  • Union of Skills: One year of concrete action to keep Europe competitive

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 30 other subscribers

About us

The present English Edition of socialpolicy.gr (SocialPolicy English Edition) is based on the need to curate and present social policy topics in depth.

Furthermore, we consider that many of our readers should be more easily informed by reading our English language content, thus adding to the accessibility of the project.

Recent Posts

  • Deal to improve the protection of vulnerable adults
  • Commission welcomes important step to modernise EU social security coordination rules
  • The ‘Right to Injustice’: A Critique of Exclusions in Greek Tertiary Education as bureaucratic trauma
  • Full report on European Child Guarantee survey among children now available
  • Union of Skills: One year of concrete action to keep Europe competitive

Popular Posts

  • Femicide: Name it, count it, end it!

    5 questions and answers about gender-based violence

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The Birth of Greek Constitutionalism

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Mental Health Officer @ MSF International

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Working at Terre des hommes

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • HR Coordinator @ MSF (Field job)

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • About us
  • All Posts
  • Collaborations
  • Home Page

© 2021 socialpolicy.gr

No Result
View All Result
  • About us
  • Events
  • Employment
    • Jobs
    • Traineeships
  • Lifelong Learning
    • Master’s Studies
    • PhD Opportunities
    • Scholarships
  • Social Policy
    • Articles
    • Gender Equality
    • Employment Policies
    • Social Economy
    • Health Policies
    • Mental Health
    • Social Cohesion
    • Social Housing
    • Social Inclusion
    • Social Policy Programs
    • Social Protection
  • Social Theory
  • Opinion
  • All Posts

© 2021 socialpolicy.gr

Skip to content
Open toolbar Accessibility Tools

Accessibility Tools

  • Increase TextIncrease Text
  • Decrease TextDecrease Text
  • GrayscaleGrayscale
  • High ContrastHigh Contrast
  • Negative ContrastNegative Contrast
  • Light BackgroundLight Background
  • Links UnderlineLinks Underline
  • Readable FontReadable Font
  • Reset Reset
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.